Continuous Provision: Making It Meaningful and Manageable

Over the years, I've worked with countless early years settings to refine their approach to continuous provision. The goal? To transform it from a daunting task into an effective, child-centred practice. Let me share some insights that might help you on this journey.

First, let's revisit what continuous provision really means. It's not just about having resources constantly available. As I often say, it's a carefully curated selection of materials placed strategically by practitioners to support learning even when an adult isn't present. This aligns with recent research by Kathy Brodie (2021), who emphasises that effective continuous provision should be "challenging, engaging, and linked to children's interests and developmental needs."

The backbone of good continuous provision is assessment. Your environment must be intrinsically linked to what your children know, can do, and need to learn next. This is where the gap and strength analysis comes in - a tool I've found invaluable in my consultancy work. By identifying areas where your cohort needs support or extension, you can tailor your provision accordingly.

However, it's crucial to remember that continuous provision isn't about creating adult-led activities in disguise. I've seen many settings fall into this trap, particularly when trying to incorporate specific learning objectives or topics. For instance, putting autumn leaves and conkers in the sand tray doesn't automatically make it meaningful continuous provision for exploring seasonal changes.

Instead, we need to think about the skills and experiences children naturally engage with in each area. This is where the concept of 'common play behaviours' comes in - something I've developed and refined over years of observation and research. By identifying these behaviours (e.g., pouring, filling, and emptying in the water area), we can provide resources that support skill progression from emergent to extending levels.

This approach aligns with Fisher's (2016) emphasis on 'provocations' in early years environments. By offering open-ended, challenging resources linked to children's current abilities and interests, we create opportunities for deep, meaningful learning through play.

One significant shift I've advocated for is moving away from designated 'basic skills' areas like writing tables or maths corners. While well-intentioned, these can often limit rather than extend learning. Instead, I encourage practitioners to weave opportunities for literacy, numeracy, and other key skills throughout the entire environment. This approach is supported by current research on effective early years practice, such as the work of Pascal et al. (2019), who highlight the importance of integrated, play-based learning experiences.

The role of the adult in continuous provision cannot be overstated. Gone are the days when we viewed play as something children do while waiting for 'real' learning to happen. Instead, skilled practitioners observe, scaffold, and teach within the context of children's self-chosen play. This aligns with Vygotsky's concept of the 'zone of proximal development' and more recent work on sustained shared thinking (Siraj-Blatchford, 2009).

When it comes to planning, I advocate for a flexible approach using what I call the 'provision pyramid'. At the base, we have our core continuous provision, informed by assessment and common play behaviours. Above this, we add enhancements linked to children's interests, current topics, or specific skills we want to develop. Finally, at the top, we have adult-led activities that complement and extend the learning happening through play.

It's worth noting that this approach requires a shift in mindset for many practitioners. We need to move away from activity-led planning and embrace a more responsive, child-centred approach. As Wood (2013) argues, effective early years practice requires us to balance child-initiated and adult-guided experiences, always keeping the unique child at the heart of our planning.

Implementing meaningful continuous provision takes time and reflection. It's not about overhauling your entire environment overnight. Start by critically examining your current provision. Ask yourself: Why do we have this area? What learning is it supporting? Are children engaging with it in the way we intended?

Remember, the goal is to create an environment where children can explore, investigate, and learn independently. As I often say, it should look like play and feel like play - but have a lot of rigour behind it. When we get it right, we see higher levels of engagement, wellbeing, and ultimately, progress and attainment.

In conclusion, effective continuous provision is about creating a space that exists both outside and with the adult, enabling children to consolidate what they already know, practice the skills they are learning, and apply their knowledge to new and unfamiliar situations. It's a journey, not a destination - but one that's incredibly rewarding for both practitioners and children alike.

More information about Continuous Provision

Books

Online Training:

References:

Brodie, K. (2021). The Holistic Care and Development of Children from Birth to Three. Routledge.

Fisher, J. (2016). Interacting or Interfering? Improving Interactions in the Early Years. Open University Press.

Pascal, C., Bertram, T., & Rouse, L. (2019). Getting it right in the Early Years Foundation Stage: A review of the evidence. Early Education.

Siraj-Blatchford, I. (2009). Conceptualising progression in the pedagogy of play and sustained shared thinking in early childhood education: A Vygotskian perspective. Educational and Child Psychology, 26(2), 77-89.

Wood, E. (2013). Play, Learning and the Early Childhood Curriculum. SAGE Publications.